Reese v. Midland Empire Packing Co

Montana Supreme Court·Decided May 20, 1981·No. 80-443·Published

Opinion

No. 80-443 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1981

ADD REESE, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. MIDLAND EMPIRE PACKING CO., INC., a Corporation, Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from: District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, In and for the County of Yellowstone. Honorable Robert Wilson, Judge presiding. Counsel of Record: For Appellant: Berger, Anderson, Sinclair, Murphy, Nelson, Edwards, and Molloy, Billings, Montana For Respondent: Ralph Herriott, Billings, Montana

Submitted on briefs: April 2, 1981 Decided: May 20, 1981 Filed : 1R.r 2 0 19fl

Clerk Mr. J u s t i c e Frank B . M o r r i s o n , J r . , d e l i v e r e d t h e O p i n i o n of t h e Court.

Midland Foods, I n c . , ( s h i p p e r ) a p p e a l s from a judgment

of $ 1 4 , 9 6 0 . 1 1 i n f a v o r of Add Reese ( c a r r i e r ) e n t e r e d Septem-

b e r 11, 1 9 8 0 , i n t h e T h i r t e e n t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Y e l l o w s t o n e

County, H o n o r a b l e R o b e r t H . Wilson p r e s i d i n g , f o l l o w i n g a

t r i a l o f t h e c o u r t h e l d o n August 1 2 , 1980. W affirm the e

t r i a l c o u r t ' s judgment i n f a v o r o f t h e c a r r i e r .

T h i s d i s p u t e i n v o l v e s l i a b i l i t y f o r damage t o 1 5 2

boxes of boned b u l l m e a t w e i g h i n g 9,120 pounds. The m e a t

was p a r t of a s h i p m e n t t a k e n by t h e c a r r i e r from t h e s h i p p e r ' s

dock i.n B i l l i n g s , Montana, and d e l i v e r e d t o Lucky S t o r e s ,

Buena P a r k , C a l i f o r n i a , i n March o f 1974. The d i s p u t e d 1 5 2

boxes o f b u l l m e a t w e r e r e f u s e d by Lucky S t o r e s when d e l i v -

e r e d by t h e c a r r i e r . The s h i p p e r d e d u c t e d t h e v a l u e o f t h e

r e j e c t e d m e a t from a n open a c c o u n t m a i n t a i n e d w i t h t h e c a r -

rier. The c a r r i e r t h e n b r o u g h t t h i s a c t i o n .

The i s s u e s on a p p e a l a r e :

1. Whether u n d e r t h e Carmack Amendment, 49 U. S C.. , § 20 / / 5'cj 7 ( l l ) , (49 U.S.C., r;2&W3j, t h e s h i p p e r i s e n t i t l e d t o judgment

a s a m a t t e r of law.

2. Whether t h e r e a r e s u f f i c i e n t f a c t s i n t h e r e c o r d t o

s u p p o r t t h e f i n d i n g s made by t h e t r i a l c o u r t .

The t r i a l c o u r t f o u n d t h a t on March 1 2 , 1974, t h e s h i p -

p e r ' s employees l o a d e d 30,000 pounds o f f r e s h m e a t i n t o t h e

carrier 's refrigerated truck-trailer u n i t for transport to

Lucky S t o r e s i n Los A n g e l e s , C a l i f o r n i a . The l o a d e d m e a t

came from c a t t l e k i l l e d by t h e s h i p p e r i n i t s p r o c e s s i n g

p l a n t a t B i l l i n g s , Montana, and from c a r c a s s e s d e l i v e r e d t o

t h e s h i p p e r by C a v i n e s s P a c k i n g Company o f Texas. The c o u r t

f u r t h e r found t h a t t h e s h i p p e r ' s employees e x e r c i - s e d ex-

c l u s i v e c o n t r o l of t h e m e a t d u r i n g b o t h t h e b u t c h e r i n g and loading process. C a r r i e r ' s d r i v e r s p i c k e d up t h e r e f r i g -

e r a t e d t r a i l e r u n i t af t e r loading.

The r e f r i g e r a t e d t r a i l e r u n i t was d e s i g n e d t o h o l d t h e

t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e meat c a r g o a t t h e same t e m p e r a t u r e t h e

meat was when l o a d e d . The t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e t r a i l e r u n i t

was s e t a t 20' F. The c o o l i n g u n i t would n o t lower t h e

t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e c a r g o below t h a t a t which i t was l o a d e d .

The c o u r t found t h a t t h e r e f r i g e r a t e d u n i t f u n c t i o n e d p r o p e r l y

on t h e h a u l t o Los Angeles.

A t t h e time of d e l i v e r y t o Lucky S t o r e s on March 1 4 ,

1974, t h e l o a d was i n s p e c t e d by one W h i s l e r , an employee

i n s p e c t o r of Lucky S t o r e s . Whisler endorsed upon t h e f r e i g h t

b i l l s and b i l l s of l a d i n g , t h e t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e meat, 34O F

--50' F , w i t h o u t s p e c i f y i n g t h e p a r t i c u l a r t e m p e r a t u r e of

any box i n t h e l o a d . Contrary t o ordinary business p r a c t i c e ,

Whisler d i d n o t e n d o r s e upon t h e f r e i g h t b i l l s o r b i l l s o f

l a d i n g t h e r e a s o n f o r r e j e c t i o n of t h e c a r g o . The c a r r i e r ' s

d r i v e r t e s t i f i e d t h a t Whisler r e j e c t e d t h e meat b e c a u s e "he

t h o u g h t t h e meat had been loaded f r o z e n and i t was i n a

thawing p r o c e s s when I d e l i v e r e d i t . " The f r o s t e d meat was

i n boxes on t h e f l o o r of t h e t r a i l e r u n i t . After learning

of t h e r e j e c t i o n , t h e s h i p p e r d i r e c t e d t h a t t h e meat be t a k e n

t o P a c i f i c Cold S t o r a g e , where' i t was - f r o z e n .

The s h i p p e r ' s meat b r o k e r l a t e r checked t h e l o a d i n

s t o r a g e and a d v i s e d t h e s h i p p e r t h a t t h e l o a d was r e j e c t e d

b e c a u s e i t was " o f f o d o r " . The s h i p p e r c o n t e n d s t h r o u g h o u t

t h e c a s e t h a t " o f f o d o r " was t h e b a s i s f o r r e j e c t i o n . The

t r i a l c o u r t d i d n o t make a f i n d i n g r e s p e c t i n g t h e r e a s o n f o r

Lucky S t o r e s r e j e c t i n g t h e l o a d .

P u r s u a n t t o d i r e c t i o n from t h e s h i p p e r , t h e c a r r i e r

r e t u r n e d t h e meat t o t h e s h i p p e r i n a t r a i l e r u n i t c a r r y i n g vegetables. The t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e t r a i l e r u n i t , w h i l e

h a u l i n g v e g e t a b l e s , was h e l d a t 38O F , which would n o t

p r e v e n t t h e f r o z e n meat from thawing. T h i s f a c t was known

t o the shipper. When t h e meat a r r i v e d i n B i l l i n g s , i t was

"soggy", and blood was r u n n i n g o u t of t h e boxes. The meat

was e v e n t u a l l y s u b m i t t e d t o a r e n d e r i n g p r o c e s s by t h e

s h i p p e r and s o l d f o r animal consumption.

The t r i a l c o u r t found t h a t t h e c a r r i e r ' s r e f r i g e r a t e d

t r a i l e r u n i t functioned properly a t a l l times. This finding

w a s premised upon t h e f a c t t h a t t h e equipment was new and

upon t h e d r i v e r ' s t e s t i m o n y t h a t p e r i o d i c c h e c k s of t h e l o a d

were made d u r i n g t r a n s p o r t .

L i a b i l i t y f o r damage t o i n t e r s t a t e shipments i s governed

by t h e Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S . C . , , 5 2 0 (1) r e e n a c t e d a s

4 9 U.S.C., 811707, w i t h o u t s u b s t a n t i v e change. This s t a t u t e

c o d i f i e s t h e common-law r u l e t h a t a c a r r i e r , though n o t a n

a b s o l u t e i n s u r e r , i s l i a b l e f o r damage u n l e s s t h e damage i s

c a u s e d by: (1) a n a c t of God, ( 2 ) t h e p u b l i c enemy, (3) the

a c t of t h e s h i p p e r , ( 4 ) a public authority, o r , (5) the

i n h e r e n t v i c e o r n a t u r e of t h e goods. Missouri P a c i f i c

R a i l r o a d v . Elmore & S t a h l ( 1 9 6 4 ) , 377 U.S. 134, 1 3 8 , 84 S.Ct.

1142, 1145, 1 2 L.Ed.2d 194.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reese v. Midland Empire Packing Co, (Mo. 1981).

Reese v. Midland Empire Packing Co (Reese v. Midland Empire Packing Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & Stahl
377 U.S. 134 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Slusser v. Ellis
355 U.S. 898 (Supreme Court, 1957)