Reese v. Mechling
This text of 2012 Ohio 2138 (Reese v. Mechling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Reese v. Mechling, 2012-Ohio-2138.]
COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
KIMBERLY J. REESE JUDGES: Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. John W. Wise, J. -vs- Case No. 11-COA-053 MICHAEL A. MECHLING, ET AL.
Defendants-Appellants OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Ashland County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 11-CIV-345
JUDGMENT: Reversed and Remanded
DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: May 11, 2012
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendants-Appellants
STEVEN J. BRIAN JOYCE V. KIMBLER Brian Law Offices 50 S. Main Street, Suite 502 81 Maplecrest Avenue, S.W. Akron, Ohio 44308 North Canton, Ohio 44720
For Wayne Mutual Insurance Company
EDWARD A. DARK 3873 Cleveland Road Wooster, Ohio 44691 Ashland County, Case No. 11-COA-053 2
Hoffman, J.
{¶1} Defendants-appellants Michael A. Mechling, et al., appeal the November
18, 2011 Judgment Entry entered by the Ashland County Court of Common Pleas
denying their Motion to Bifurcate. Plaintiff-appellee is Kimberly J. Reese.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE1
{¶2} Appellee sued Appellants for injuries alleged to have resulted from
Appellant Michael Mechling’s operation of his vehicle. Appellee was a passenger in the
vehicle. Appellee sought both compensatory and punitive damages.
{¶3} Appellants filed a Motion to Bifurcate the issue of punitive damages
pursuant to R.C. 2315.21. On November 18, 2011, the trial court overruled the motion.
{¶4} It is from that entry Appellants prosecute this appeal, assigning as error:
{¶5} “I. THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR WHEN IT
DENIED APPELLANT’S MOTION TO BIFURCATE PLAINTIFF’S PUNITIVE DAMAGES
CLAIM PURSUANT TO §R.C.2315.21(B).”
{¶6} The trial court overruled Appellant’s Motion to Bifurcate based upon this
Court’s ruling in Plaugher v. Oniala, 2011 Ohio 1207. In Plaugher, this Court found R.C.
2315.21(B) to be unconstitutional.
{¶7} Subsequent to the trial court’s decision and while this appeal was pending,
the Ohio Supreme Court decided Havel v. Villa St. Joseph, 2012-Ohio-552. Therein,
the Supreme Court specifically found R.C. 2315.21(B) does not violate the Ohio
Constitution. Id, syllabus 1.
{¶8} Based upon Havel, Appellants’ assignment of error is sustained.
1 A rendition of the facts is unnecessary for our resolution of this appeal. Ashland County, Case No. 11-COA-053 3
{¶9} The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded to that
court for further proceedings.
By: Hoffman, J.
Delaney, P.J. and
Wise, J. concur
s/William B. Hoffman _________________ HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN
s/ Patricia A. Delaney _________________ HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY
s/ John W. Wise _____________________ HON. JOHN W. WISE Ashland County, Case No. 11-COA-053 4
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
KIMBERLY J. REESE : : Plaintiff-Appellee : : -vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY : MICHAEL A. MECHLING, ET AL. : : Defendants-Appellants : Case No. 11-COA-053
For the reasons stated in our accompanying Opinion, the judgment of the
Ashland County Court is reversed and this matter is remanded to that court for further
proceedings in accordance with our Opinion and the law. Costs to Appellee.
s/ William B. Hoffman_________________ HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN
s/ Patricia A. Delaney _________________ HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY
s/ John W. Wise _____________________ HON. JOHN W. WISE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 2138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-mechling-ohioctapp-2012.