Reese v. Manget
This text of 183 S.E. 62 (Reese v. Manget) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the allegations and the prayers of the petition, no equitable or other relief which would afford jurisdiction to this court is sought. The prayer is for a money judgment by way of damages for breach of a warranty contained in a deed. The words "that said defendants be required to make good the title to the said property” are mere surplusage, but, construed with the entire prayer, merely mean that the defendant be required to make good the title by paying damages. It follows that the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction; and the case is transferred to that court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 S.E. 62, 181 Ga. 491, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-manget-ga-1935.