Reese v. Manget

183 S.E. 62, 181 Ga. 491, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 136
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 10, 1935
DocketNo. 11071
StatusPublished

This text of 183 S.E. 62 (Reese v. Manget) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reese v. Manget, 183 S.E. 62, 181 Ga. 491, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 136 (Ga. 1935).

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

Under the allegations and the prayers of the petition, no equitable or other relief which would afford jurisdiction to this court is sought. The prayer is for a money judgment by way of damages for breach of a warranty contained in a deed. The words "that said defendants be required to make good the title to the said property” are mere surplusage, but, construed with the entire prayer, merely mean that the defendant be required to make good the title by paying damages. It follows that the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction; and the case is transferred to that court.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 S.E. 62, 181 Ga. 491, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-manget-ga-1935.