Reese v. Lombard
This text of 387 N.E.2d 1215 (Reese v. Lombard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The orders appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, on the basis of our holding and the rationale enunciated in Matter of Sirles v Cordary (40 NY2d 950, affg on opn at 49 AD2d 330). We would caution, however, that the rationale enunciated in Sirles is properly applicable only to purported contractual limitations upon a new Sheriffs power to appoint, retain, dismiss, promote, or demote deputies whose office required the performance of some civil obligations, and might not serve to justify repudiation by a new Sheriff of other terms of a contract validly entered into by his predecessor.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.
Orders affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
387 N.E.2d 1215, 46 N.Y.2d 904, 414 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1847, 102 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-lombard-ny-1979.