Reese v. Lombard

387 N.E.2d 1215, 46 N.Y.2d 904, 414 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1847, 102 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2240
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 1979·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The orders appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, on the basis of our holding and the rationale enunciated in Matter of Sirles v Cordary (40 NY2d 950, affg on opn at 49 AD2d 330). We would caution, however, that the rationale enunciated in Sirles is properly applicable only to purported contractual limitations upon a new Sheriffs power to appoint, retain, dismiss, promote, or demote deputies whose office required the performance of some civil obligations, and might not serve to justify repudiation by a new Sheriff of other terms of a contract validly entered into by his predecessor.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.

Orders affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reese v. Lombard, 387 N.E.2d 1215, 46 N.Y.2d 904, 414 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1847, 102 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2240 (N.Y. 1979).

387 N.E.2d 1215 (Reese v. Lombard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Monroe v. Newman
125 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
County of Monroe v. AFSCME
492 N.E.2d 393 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
County of Monroe v. AFSCME
106 A.D.2d 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
County of Monroe v. AFSCME, Council 82
90 A.D.2d 968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)