Reese v. Kirby

68 Ga. 825
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 15, 1882·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

1. The finding of the judge, presiding without a jury, was supported by the evidence.

2. Where a suit had been pending in court for over ten years without process, and no plea had -been filed, or defence made by the defendant, it was proper to refuse to allow process to be attached and to grant time to perfect service. Code, §3490; 67 Ga., 576.

3. Where a rule nisi to establish a lost note is answered, and a defence made thereto, such appearance and pleading by the defendant in that proceeding will not cure the failure to attach process to a suit on the note sought to be established. The proceedings are different, and a defence to one does not waive process to the other.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reese v. Kirby, 68 Ga. 825 (Ga. 1882).

68 Ga. 825 (Reese v. Kirby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicholas v. British America Assurance Co.
34 S.E. 1004 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)