Home/Court of Appeals of South Carolina/Reese v. Holmes

Reese v. Holmes

26 S.C. Eq. 531
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedMay 15, 1852
StatusPublished

This text of 26 S.C. Eq. 531 (Reese v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reese v. Holmes, 26 S.C. Eq. 531 (S.C. Ct. App. 1852).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the decree; and it is ordered, that the same be affirmed; and that the appeal be dismissed.

Johnston, Dunkin and Dabgan, CC., concurring. Wardlaw, Ch., having been of counsel, did not hear the appeal.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 S.C. Eq. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-holmes-scctapp-1852.