Reese v. Hamilton

20 Tex. 668
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 20 Tex. 668 (Reese v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reese v. Hamilton, 20 Tex. 668 (Tex. 1858).

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

The statute is express and positive, that no writ of certiorari shall be issued unless the party applying shall first give bond, &c. (Hart. Dig. Art. 1753.) The law makes no exception, and none has been recognized in practice. The provision of Art. 804, of the Digest, is made expressly to apply to costs and appeals, and does not include a proceeding by certiorari; which is not, like an appeal, a matter of right, and of course there is no more authority of law for awarding a certiorari, in favor of an executor or administrator, without requiring the party to give bond, than for awarding any extraordinary writ—a sequestration or attachment—in favor of such party, without the bond required by the statute. The Court would not be warranted in making the case of an executor or administrator [670]*670an exception, by judicial construction, to the peremptory mandate of the statute. The fiat of the judge very properly made the giving of the bond a condition precedent to the issuing of the writ; and the party having failed to give the bond as required, there was no error in dismissing the petition. The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Munday v. First State Bank of Munday
66 S.W.2d 775 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Adoue & Lobit v. Gonzales
54 S.W. 367 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Tex. 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-hamilton-tex-1858.