Reese v. County of Escambia

103 So. 606, 89 Fla. 99
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 14, 1925·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This canse having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court' being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reese v. County of Escambia, 103 So. 606, 89 Fla. 99 (Fla. 1925).

103 So. 606 (Reese v. County of Escambia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stringfellow v. Atlantic Coast Line R.
64 F.2d 173 (Fifth Circuit, 1933)