Reese v. Corcoran
52 Cal. 495
Opinion
The findings in this case are to the effect: First, that the defendants were in possession; second, that they were not in posses•sion of the premises sued for. No judgment could properly be entered upon such a contradiction in the findings.
Judgment and order denying a new trial reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reese v. Corcoran, 52 Cal. 495 (Cal. 1877).
52 Cal. 495 (Reese v. Corcoran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fanta v. Maddex
252 P. 630 (California Court of Appeal, 1926)
Bank of Commerce v. Broyles
120 P. 670 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1910)
Kountz v. Kountz
87 N.W. 523 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1901)
Gwin v. Gwin
48 P. 295 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1897)
Walley v. Deseret National Bank
47 P. 147 (Utah Supreme Court, 1896)
Learned v. Castle
21 P. 11 (California Supreme Court, 1889)