Reese v. Cannon

98 S.W. 370, 80 Ark. 574, 1906 Ark. LEXIS 192
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 26, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 98 S.W. 370 (Reese v. Cannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reese v. Cannon, 98 S.W. 370, 80 Ark. 574, 1906 Ark. LEXIS 192 (Ark. 1906).

Opinion

Riddick, J.

The only question in this case is a question of costs in a contest of an election for the removal of a county seat. After the decision of the case a motion was made to retax. costs of the contest of the election in Buck Range Township, and the court retaxed the costs, and refused to allow contestee’s costs of witnesses in that township on the ground that the validity of the election had been fully established before the depositions of these witnesses were taken. He also refused to allow costs of copying stenographer’s short-hand notes. As the validity of the election of that township was challenged by the contestants, and as its regularity was not conceded until after these depositions were taken, we think the contestees had the right to take these depositions, and are entitled to their costs. There is no provision in the statute for costs of copying stenographer’s notes, and that item of costs, amounting to thirty dollars, was properly disallowed.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded with an order to enter judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Borges v. Green
192 S.W. 378 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1917)
Russell v. Webb
131 S.W. 456 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 S.W. 370, 80 Ark. 574, 1906 Ark. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-cannon-ark-1906.