Reese v. Attorney General

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 12, 2025·No. 1D2025-0858·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2025-0858 _____________________________

DAVID NATHANIEL REESE,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

August 12, 2025

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED as moot.

RAY, BILBREY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

David Nathaniel Reese, pro se, Petitioner. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reese v. Attorney General, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Reese v. Attorney General (Reese v. Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.