Reese v. Attorney General
This text of Reese v. Attorney General (Reese v. Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-0858 _____________________________
DAVID NATHANIEL REESE,
Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
August 12, 2025
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED as moot.
RAY, BILBREY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
David Nathaniel Reese, pro se, Petitioner. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reese v. Attorney General, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-attorney-general-fladistctapp-2025.