Reese v. Aronoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reese v. Aronoff

26 A.D.2d 525, 271 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4002

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 525 (Reese v. Aronoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reese v. Aronoff, 26 A.D.2d 525, 271 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4002 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders of Family Court, entered June 29,1965 and August 10, 1965, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exere’se of discretion, to fix the amount of support directed to be paid by the respondent for the support and maintenance of his three infant children at the sum of $130 per week, and said orders other[526]*526wise affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to the petitioner. A prior separation agreement, which had been incorporated into a Mexican divorce decree, provided for $130 weekly payments by the defendant for the support of his children. Since, on the basis of the record, it is established that the said sum is presently the fair and reasonable sum required to be paid for their support and maintenance and that the respondent is possessed of sufficient means to pay the same, it was improper for the court to reduce the payments to $110 per week. (See Family Ct. Act, § 413.) Concur ■—Botein, P. J., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders of Family Court, entered June 29,1965 and August 10, 1965, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exere’se of discretion, to fix the amount of support directed to be paid by the respondent for the support and maintenance of his three infant children at the sum of $130 per week, and said orders other[526]*526wise affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to the petitioner. A prior separation agreement, which had been incorporated into a Mexican divorce decree, provided for $130 weekly payments by the defendant for the support of his children. Since, on the basis of the record, it is established that the said sum is presently the fair and reasonable sum required to be paid for their support and maintenance and that the respondent is possessed of sufficient means to pay the same, it was improper for the court to reduce the payments to $110 per week. (See Family Ct. Act, § 413.) Concur ■—Botein, P. J., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 525, 271 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-aronoff-nyappdiv-1966.