Rees v. Villano

70 A.3d 1161, 144 Conn. App. 76, 2013 WL 3380122, 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 341
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedJuly 9, 2013
DocketAC 34753
StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.3d 1161 (Rees v. Villano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rees v. Villano, 70 A.3d 1161, 144 Conn. App. 76, 2013 WL 3380122, 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 341 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendants Ellen J. Villano and Anthony Villano appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff Filomena Rees. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly precluded them from presenting an expert witness. After reviewing the record and appellate briefs, we conclude that the defendants’ claim is without merit and that the court properly rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure in favor of the plaintiff.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 A.3d 1161, 144 Conn. App. 76, 2013 WL 3380122, 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rees-v-villano-connappct-2013.