Rees v. Villano

Connecticut Appellate Court

Rees v. Villano

70 A.3d 1161, 144 Conn. App. 76, 2013 WL 3380122, 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 341

Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided July 9, 2013·No. AC 34753·Published

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendants Ellen J. Villano and Anthony Villano appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff Filomena Rees. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly precluded them from presenting an expert witness. After reviewing the record and appellate briefs, we conclude that the defendants’ claim is without merit and that the court properly rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure in favor of the plaintiff.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendants Ellen J. Villano and Anthony Villano appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff Filomena Rees. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly precluded them from presenting an expert witness. After reviewing the record and appellate briefs, we conclude that the defendants’ claim is without merit and that the court properly rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure in favor of the plaintiff.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.

Rees v. Villano, 70 A.3d 1161, 144 Conn. App. 76, 2013 WL 3380122, 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 341 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

70 A.3d 1161 (Rees v. Villano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.