Rees v. State

41 S.W.2d 857, 112 Tex. Crim. 41, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 209
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rees v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 883
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 23, 1929·No. 12175, 12176, 12177, 12178·Published

Opinions

*42 CHRISTIAN, Judge.

— This is an appeal from a final judgment upon forfeiture of an appearance bond.

The record fails to show that any briefs were filed by appellants in the trial court. We fail to find a waiver by the state of such filing. Moreover, no brief is on file in this court. It is the uniform holding of this court that in cases such as this briefs must be filed in the trial court and in this court in compliance with the law and rules governing civil cases, or a waiver of such filing must appear of record. Article 2283, Revised Civil Statutes 1925; Article 856 C. C. P.; Lewis et al. v. State, 7 S. W. (2d) 74; Bratton et al. v. State, 4 S. W. (2d) 562.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rees v. State, 41 S.W.2d 857, 112 Tex. Crim. 41, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 209 (Tex. 1929).

41 S.W.2d 857 (Rees v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis v. State
7 S.W.2d 74 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Bratton v. State
4 S.W.2d 562 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)