Rees v. Evans
1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 6, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 302
Opinion
The chancellor decided, in this case, that any allegation in an answer that the defendant believes Ms character is much better than that of the complainant, or of tbe solicitor who drew the bill, is scandalous and impertinent, although the charges in the bill impeach the conduct of the defendant or of his solicitor in reference to the subject of the suit. Order of the vice-chancellor affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rees v. Evans, 1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 6, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 302 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).
1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 6 (Rees v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.