Rees v. Evans

Saratoga Chancery Court

Rees v. Evans

1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 6, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 302

DecidedJanuary 25, 1841

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 6 (Rees v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Saratoga Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rees v. Evans, 1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 6, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 302 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).

Pincite

Opinion

The chancellor decided, in this case, that any allegation in an answer that the defendant believes Ms character is much better than that of the complainant, or of tbe solicitor who drew the bill, is scandalous and impertinent, although the charges in the bill impeach the conduct of the defendant or of his solicitor in reference to the subject of the suit. Order of the vice-chancellor affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The chancellor decided, in this case, that any allegation in an answer that the defendant believes Ms character is much better than that of the complainant, or of tbe solicitor who drew the bill, is scandalous and impertinent, although the charges in the bill impeach the conduct of the defendant or of his solicitor in reference to the subject of the suit. Order of the vice-chancellor affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 6, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rees-v-evans-nychanctsara-1841.