Reel Bros. v. Lee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Reel Bros. v. Lee

186 N.C. 165

DecidedOctober 3, 1923

StatusPublished

This text of 186 N.C. 165 (Reel Bros. v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reel Bros. v. Lee, 186 N.C. 165 (N.C. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Clare, C. J.

Upon the evidence that the defendant Hardison was endorser of the $1,500 note which had later been endorsed by the plaintiffs to the bank, and the evidence that the account in the agricultural lien, and the store account held by the plaintiff against said Lee, and the $500 note of Lee, which was also in evidence, the issue should have been submitted to the jury whether the defendant Hardison was a cosurety with Lee to the plaintiff, and the judgment of nonsuit should be

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clare, C. J.

Upon the evidence that the defendant Hardison was endorser of the $1,500 note which had later been endorsed by the plaintiffs to the bank, and the evidence that the account in the agricultural lien, and the store account held by the plaintiff against said Lee, and the $500 note of Lee, which was also in evidence, the issue should have been submitted to the jury whether the defendant Hardison was a cosurety with Lee to the plaintiff, and the judgment of nonsuit should be

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 N.C. 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reel-bros-v-lee-nc-1923.