Reehan Malik v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company, Inc., Tara Carthew, Robert M. Miller, Tony Nicely and Sura Omar

Court of Appeals of Texas

Reehan Malik v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company, Inc., Tara Carthew, Robert M. Miller, Tony Nicely and Sura Omar

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 17, 2019·No. 01-19-00489-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Reehan Malik v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company, Inc., Tara Carthew, Robert M. Miller, Tony Nicely, and Sura Omar

Appellate case number: 01-19-00489-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-62710

Trial court: 333rd District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Reehan Malik, has filed a motion to extend time to file his appellate brief, which does not comply with the Rules. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a)(5) (requiring certificate of conference stating appellant conferred, or made reasonable attempt to confer, with all parties about merits of motion and whether those parties oppose motion); Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(b)(1)(D) (requiring motion to state number of previous extensions granted). Nevertheless, appellant filed his brief on October 11, 2019. Accordingly, appellant’s motion is GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __October 17, 2019__

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Reehan Malik v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company, Inc., Tara Carthew, Robert M. Miller, Tony Nicely, and Sura Omar

Appellate case number: 01-19-00489-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-62710

Trial court: 333rd District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Reehan Malik, has filed a motion to extend time to file his appellate brief, which does not comply with the Rules. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a)(5) (requiring certificate of conference stating appellant conferred, or made reasonable attempt to confer, with all parties about merits of motion and whether those parties oppose motion); Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(b)(1)(D) (requiring motion to state number of previous extensions granted). Nevertheless, appellant filed his brief on October 11, 2019. Accordingly, appellant’s motion is GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __October 17, 2019__

Reehan Malik v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company, Inc., Tara Carthew, Robert M. Miller, Tony Nicely and Sura Omar, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Reehan Malik v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company, Inc., Tara Carthew, Robert M. Miller, Tony Nicely and Sura Omar (Reehan Malik v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company, Inc., Tara Carthew, Robert M. Miller, Tony Nicely and Sura Omar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.