Reef Investments, Inc. v. Valle
745 So. 2d 544, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16545, 1999 WL 1115292
This text of 745 So. 2d 544 (Reef Investments, Inc. v. Valle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reef Investments, Inc. v. Valle, 745 So. 2d 544, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16545, 1999 WL 1115292 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
We affirm the Final Judgment Denying Foreclosure. The trial court correctly applied the doctrine of laches in favor of appellees. See Travis Co. v. Mayes, 160 Fla. 375, 36 So.2d 264 (1948); Ratner v. Miami Beach First Nat’l Bank, 368 So.2d 1326, 1328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Briggs v. Estate of Geelhoed ex rel. Johnson, 543 So.2d 332, 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Briggs v. Estate of Geelhoed Ex Rel. Johnson
543 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
The Travis Co. v. Mayes
36 So. 2d 264 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Ratner v. Miami Beach First National Bank
368 So. 2d 1326 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
745 So. 2d 544, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16545, 1999 WL 1115292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reef-investments-inc-v-valle-fladistctapp-1999.