Reef Investments, Inc. v. Valle
745 So. 2d 544, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16545, 1999 WL 1115292
Opinion
We affirm the Final Judgment Denying Foreclosure. The trial court correctly applied the doctrine of laches in favor of appellees. See Travis Co. v. Mayes, 160 Fla. 375, 36 So.2d 264 (1948); Ratner v. Miami Beach First Nat’l Bank, 368 So.2d 1326, 1328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Briggs v. Estate of Geelhoed ex rel. Johnson, 543 So.2d 332, 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reef Investments, Inc. v. Valle, 745 So. 2d 544, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16545, 1999 WL 1115292 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
745 So. 2d 544 (Reef Investments, Inc. v. Valle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Briggs v. Estate of Geelhoed Ex Rel. Johnson
543 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
The Travis Co. v. Mayes
36 So. 2d 264 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Ratner v. Miami Beach First National Bank
368 So. 2d 1326 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)