Reedom v. Commissioner

D.C. Circuit

Reedom v. Commissioner

463 F. App'x 5

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 2012

DocketNo. 11-1234

StatusPublished

This text of 463 F. App'x 5 (Reedom v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reedom v. Commissioner, 463 F. App'x 5 (D.C. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States Tax Court and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(3). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the United States Tax Court’s decision dismissing appellant’s petition for lack of jurisdiction be affirmed. Although appellant appears to dispute a notice of determination concerning collection action, he has not produced any such notice that would allow him to invoke the Tax Court’s jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States Tax Court and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(3). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the United States Tax Court’s decision dismissing appellant’s petition for lack of jurisdiction be affirmed. Although appellant appears to dispute a notice of determination concerning collection action, he has not produced any such notice that would allow him to invoke the Tax Court’s jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

463 F. App'x 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reedom-v-commissioner-cadc-2012.