Reeder v. State

325 S.W.3d 529, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2010 WL 3760263
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 28, 2010·No. ED 93723·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles L. Reeder (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of Circuit Court of the *530 City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. Sup.Ct. R. (2010), unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reeder v. State, 325 S.W.3d 529, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2010 WL 3760263 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

325 S.W.3d 529 (Reeder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.