Reeder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reeder v. State

194 So. 3d 1103, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11307, 2016 WL 4035590

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 25, 2016

DocketNo. 1D14-4702

StatusPublished

This text of 194 So. 3d 1103 (Reeder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reeder v. State, 194 So. 3d 1103, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11307, 2016 WL 4035590 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

Our original opinion in this case reversed Appellant’s conviction for second-degree murder and remanded for a new trial based on this court’s decision in Floyd v. State, 151 So.3d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (Floyd I). Floyd I was quashed by the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Floyd, 186 So.3d 1013 (Fla.2016) (Floyd II), and the Court thereafter quashed our original opinion in this case and remanded “for reconsideration upon application of [the] decision [in] [Floyd II ].”

Based on Floyd II, we reject Appellant’s argument that the jury instructions in this case were fundamentally erroneous. And, consistent with our original opinion, we again find no merit in the other issues raised by Appellant. Accordingly, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and JAY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI