Reeder v. State
This text of 688 So. 2d 458 (Reeder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court’s summary denial of Appellant’s rule 3.800 motion is affirmed. The motion does not allege that the trial court imposed a sentence exceeding the statutory maximum, as contemplated in Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995), but instead challenges the legality of Appellant’s conviction [459]*459under State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995). A claim such as this must be presented in a sworn motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850. We express no opinion on the merits of the claim.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
688 So. 2d 458, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1815, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeder-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.