Reeder v. State
688 So. 2d 458, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1815, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 630
Opinion
The trial court’s summary denial of Appellant’s rule 3.800 motion is affirmed. The motion does not allege that the trial court imposed a sentence exceeding the statutory maximum, as contemplated in Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995), but instead challenges the legality of Appellant’s conviction [459]*459under State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995). A claim such as this must be presented in a sworn motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850. We express no opinion on the merits of the claim.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reeder v. State, 688 So. 2d 458, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1815, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 630 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
688 So. 2d 458 (Reeder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
661 So. 2d 1193 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
State v. Gray
654 So. 2d 552 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)