Reeder v. Murray

3 Ark. 450
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 15, 1841·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Dickinson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The r.ecord sent up is certified to he full and complete. The parties have raised no question as to its correctness, and, consequently, this Court must take it as true. It is'of no consequence, in the consideration of this case, what steps were taken subsequent to the issuing of the alias writ of attachment; for, by the record, it appears that the Clerk omitted to seal the writ, as is required by the statute. Revised Code, p. 777, sec. 2. And as there was no such appearance by the appellant as cured the want of a seal to the writ, he was not bound to plead or make any defence thereto. Judgment reversed, and case remanded for further proceedings; and the case, upon the return thereof to the Circuit Court, to stand for hearing, as though the appellant had been legally served with a valid writ of summons, more than thirty days prior to the nest term of said Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reeder v. Murray, 3 Ark. 450 (Ark. 1841).

3 Ark. 450 (Reeder v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southwestern Settlement & Development Co. v. Randolph
240 S.W. 655 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Sharman v. Huot
52 P. 558 (Montana Supreme Court, 1898)
Choate v. Spencer
20 L.R.A. 424 (Montana Supreme Court, 1893)
State v. Davis
73 Ind. 359 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Mitchell v. Conley
8 Ark. 414 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1853)