Reeder v. Kennard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Reeder v. Kennard

1918 OK 477, 175 P. 829, 71 Okla. 156, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 896

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 13, 1918

Docket9959

StatusPublished

This text of 1918 OK 477 (Reeder v. Kennard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reeder v. Kennard, 1918 OK 477, 175 P. 829, 71 Okla. 156, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 896 (Okla. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought by defendants in error on certain promissory notes and foreclosure of a mortgage to secure the payment of same. Various persons claiming an interest in the property covered by the mortgage were joined as defendants. A joint judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs below, from which plaintiffs in error, 'Charles F. Reeder and Jessica Reeder, appealed.

Motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed upon, the ground that one of 'the defendants below whose interests will he affected hjr a reversal or modification of the judgment was not made party to this appeal, and no case-made was served upon him or his attorney. Under the settled rule in *157 this jurisdiction' all parties to a joint judgment whose interests will be affected by reversal or modification of the judgment ap' l>ealed from must be made parties to the appeal. Where such has not been done, the appeal will be dismissed.

Motion to dismiss will be sustained and ilie appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought by defendants in error on certain promissory notes and foreclosure of a mortgage to secure the payment of same. Various persons claiming an interest in the property covered by the mortgage were joined as defendants. A joint judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs below, from which plaintiffs in error, 'Charles F. Reeder and Jessica Reeder, appealed.

Motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed upon, the ground that one of 'the defendants below whose interests will he affected hjr a reversal or modification of the judgment was not made party to this appeal, and no case-made was served upon him or his attorney. Under the settled rule in *157 this jurisdiction' all parties to a joint judgment whose interests will be affected by reversal or modification of the judgment ap' l>ealed from must be made parties to the appeal. Where such has not been done, the appeal will be dismissed.

Motion to dismiss will be sustained and ilie appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1918 OK 477, 175 P. 829, 71 Okla. 156, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeder-v-kennard-okla-1918.