Reeder v. Healey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reeder v. Healey

248 A.D. 554

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 554 (Reeder v. Healey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reeder v. Healey, 248 A.D. 554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the defenses and counterclaims set forth in the amended answers of the defendants unanimously modified by striking the third affirmative defense and the first, second and third counterclaims from the answer of defendant Giles G. Healey; a,-nil also by striking out the two defenses interposed by The Birconjel Corporation to the second cause of action, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the defenses and counterclaims set forth in the amended answers of the defendants unanimously modified by striking the third affirmative defense and the first, second and third counterclaims from the answer of defendant Giles G. Healey; a,-nil also by striking out the two defenses interposed by The Birconjel Corporation to the second cause of action, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeder-v-healey-nyappdiv-1936.