Reeder v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Reeder v. Director of Patuxent Institution

168 A.2d 190, 224 Md. 659, 1961 Md. LEXIS 549

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 7, 1961·No. App. No. 51·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency is denied. The basic contentions that he was not proved to be a defective delinquent but simply an alcoholic and that he was not shown to be an actual danger to society are rebutted by the uncontradicted medical testimony and his rather extensive criminal record. There was evidence to support the finding of the trial judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency is denied. The basic contentions that he was not proved to be a defective delinquent but simply an alcoholic and that he was not shown to be an actual danger to society are rebutted by the uncontradicted medical testimony and his rather extensive criminal record. There was evidence to support the finding of the trial judge.

Reeder v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 168 A.2d 190, 224 Md. 659, 1961 Md. LEXIS 549 (Md. 1961).

Pincite

168 A.2d 190 (Reeder v. Director of Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.