Reeder v. Craig

14 S.C.L. 411
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 15, 1826
StatusPublished

This text of 14 S.C.L. 411 (Reeder v. Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reeder v. Craig, 14 S.C.L. 411 (S.C. Ct. App. 1826).

Opinion

Nott. J

a man sell land to which he has no title, and afterwards aquire a title he is estopped by his first deed to say be had no title at the time of sale. 1 Harris & M’Henry, 523, Hawkins vs. Hanson. Co. Lit. 47. b, 352, a. Plowden, 434. 10 Ves. 460. Termes de la Ley, 209.

The motion is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 S.C.L. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeder-v-craig-scctapp-1826.