Reeder v. Administrator, No. 0110064 (Jul. 30, 1993)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6634
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided July 30, 1993·No. No. 0110064·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Here the appellant, Paul Reeder (Reeder) appeals from the Commissioner's decision to penalize him for filing a false claim for two weeks credit against a penalty previously assessed against him for previously filing false claims for unemployment compensation. To seek such a credit Reeder indicated he was not employed or earning wages for the two weeks.

After reviewing the exhibits in the record, hearing the parties,1 considering the parties' briefs, the court is unable to conclude the Commissioner acted unreasonably, arbitrarily or illegally in assessing the further penalty Fellin v.Administrator, 196 Conn. 440.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

MCDONALD, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reeder v. Administrator, No. 0110064 (Jul. 30, 1993), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6634 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6634 (Reeder v. Administrator, No. 0110064 (Jul. 30, 1993)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fellin v. Administrator
493 A.2d 174 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1985)