Reeder v. Administrator, No. 0110064 (Jul. 30, 1993)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6634
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJuly 30, 1993
DocketNo. 0110064
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6634 (Reeder v. Administrator, No. 0110064 (Jul. 30, 1993)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reeder v. Administrator, No. 0110064 (Jul. 30, 1993), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6634 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Here the appellant, Paul Reeder (Reeder) appeals from the Commissioner's decision to penalize him for filing a false claim for two weeks credit against a penalty previously assessed against him for previously filing false claims for unemployment compensation. To seek such a credit Reeder indicated he was not employed or earning wages for the two weeks.

After reviewing the exhibits in the record, hearing the parties,1 considering the parties' briefs, the court is unable to conclude the Commissioner acted unreasonably, arbitrarily or illegally in assessing the further penalty Fellin v.Administrator, 196 Conn. 440.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

MCDONALD, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fellin v. Administrator
493 A.2d 174 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 6634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeder-v-administrator-no-0110064-jul-30-1993-connsuperct-1993.