Reed v. Whitehead
This text of 430 S.W.2d 858 (Reed v. Whitehead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant Maxine Reed filed a complaint in the Chancery Court seeking to enjoin appellee W. R. Whitehead from acting in the capacity of “third member” of the Dallas County Board of Election Commissioners, claiming at the same time that she was the proper person to hold such office. Appellee filed an answer and counterclaim seeking to enjoin appellant from usurping the office to which appellee claimed to have been appointed.
The complaint and counterclaim, considered in all their respects, must be held to be a suit for the purpose of trying title to the office of “third member” of the County Board of Election Commissioners. We have consistently held that a court of equity does not have jurisdiction to determine questions concerning the appointment or election of public officers or their title to office. Davis v. Wilson, 183 Ark. 271, 35 S.W. 2d 1020 (1931).
The judgment entered below in favor of appellee Whitehead is reversed and the cause remanded to the Chancery Court with directions to dismiss same for lack of jurisdiction, any remaining issues which might warrant a transfer to law docket having become moot by virtue of our decision of this date in Ellis v. Rockefeller.
Reversed and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
430 S.W.2d 858, 245 Ark. 52, 1968 Ark. LEXIS 1155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-whitehead-ark-1968.