Reed v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Reed v. United States

620 F. App'x 194

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2015·No. No. 15-6773·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Trevor Reed appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his medical malpractice claim brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reed v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-00247-LMB-IDD, 2015 WL 1402127 (E.D.Va. Mar. 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Trevor Reed appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his medical malpractice claim brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reed v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-00247-LMB-IDD, 2015 WL 1402127 (E.D.Va. Mar. 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reed v. United States, 620 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

620 F. App'x 194 (Reed v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related