Reed v. Tay

32 Me. 173
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1850·Published

Opinion

Wells, J.,

orally,— No error of fact has been assigned. No fact, extra the record, has been proved. We must therefore regard the charge as an error of law. A denial to allow costs to the exact amount claimed, when some amount is allowed, is not error in law.

Judgment of the justice affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. Tay, 32 Me. 173 (Me. 1850).

32 Me. 173 (Reed v. Tay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.