Reed v. Tax Court of United States
This text of 157 F.2d 79 (Reed v. Tax Court of United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant sued the Tax Court of the United States to require it to admit him to practice. He alleged that he was being discriminated against, arbitrarily and contrary to law, because of not being a licensed attorney or a certified public accountant. He had twice been examined as an applicant for admission and rejected. But since he was and is eligible under the rules of the Tax Court to take a third examination he has not exhausted his remedy in the Tax Court, and the District Court was clearly right in dismissing his complaint. United States v. Hawley, 50 App. D.C. 137, 269 F. 479. We need not consider the several additional reasons for af-firmance which are urged on behalf of ap-pellee.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 F.2d 79, 81 U.S. App. D.C. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-tax-court-of-united-states-cadc-1946.