Reed v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Reed v. State

1920 OK CR 42, 196 P. 1103, 18 Okla. Crim. 727, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 233

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 21, 1920

DocketA-3265

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 42 (Reed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reed v. State, 1920 OK CR 42, 196 P. 1103, 18 Okla. Crim. 727, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 233 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the superior court of Ok-mulgee county, wherein the defendants, husband and wife, were jointly tried and convicted of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and sentenced to pay a fine of $250, and to serve thirty days each in the county jail.

To reverse this judgment, the defendants have appealed to this court, and have assigned as errors several grounds which have heretofore been considered in appeals in similar cases, and the questions raised have been decided, adversely to the contentions of counsel'representing these defendants.

A careful consideration of the brief filed in behalf of the defendants, and a thoughtful consideration of the record in connection with the same, thoroughly convinces this court that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction, and that no error of law occurred during the progress of the trial sufficiently prejudicial to authorize a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment as to each defendant is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the superior court of Ok-mulgee county, wherein the defendants, husband and wife, were jointly tried and convicted of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and sentenced to pay a fine of $250, and to serve thirty days each in the county jail.

To reverse this judgment, the defendants have appealed to this court, and have assigned as errors several grounds which have heretofore been considered in appeals in similar cases, and the questions raised have been decided, adversely to the contentions of counsel'representing these defendants.

A careful consideration of the brief filed in behalf of the defendants, and a thoughtful consideration of the record in connection with the same, thoroughly convinces this court that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction, and that no error of law occurred during the progress of the trial sufficiently prejudicial to authorize a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment as to each defendant is accordingly affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 42, 196 P. 1103, 18 Okla. Crim. 727, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.