Reed v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Reed v. State

21 S.E.2d 913, 68 Ga. App. 15

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 16, 1942·No. 29748.·Published

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The defendant was convicted under the Code, § 26-2001, of the offense of being a “Peeping Tom.” The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. The special ground of the motion for new trial complaining of the admission of evidence, is without merit, under the charge to the jury and under all the facts of the case. It would serve no good purpose to detail the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

The defendant was convicted under the Code, § 26-2001, of the offense of being a “Peeping Tom.” The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. The special ground of the motion for new trial complaining of the admission of evidence, is without merit, under the charge to the jury and under all the facts of the case. It would serve no good purpose to detail the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Reed v. State, 21 S.E.2d 913, 68 Ga. App. 15 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

21 S.E.2d 913 (Reed v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.