Reed v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Reed v. State

21 S.E.2d 913, 68 Ga. App. 15

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 16, 1942

Docket29748.

StatusPublished

This text of 21 S.E.2d 913 (Reed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reed v. State, 21 S.E.2d 913, 68 Ga. App. 15 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The defendant was convicted under the Code, § 26-2001, of the offense of being a “Peeping Tom.” The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. The special ground of the motion for new trial complaining of the admission of evidence, is without merit, under the charge to the jury and under all the facts of the case. It would serve no good purpose to detail the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

The defendant was convicted under the Code, § 26-2001, of the offense of being a “Peeping Tom.” The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. The special ground of the motion for new trial complaining of the admission of evidence, is without merit, under the charge to the jury and under all the facts of the case. It would serve no good purpose to detail the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 S.E.2d 913, 68 Ga. App. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-state-gactapp-1942.