Reed v. State

552 So. 2d 347, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2711, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6442, 1989 WL 139520
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 1989·No. Nos. 88-2483 & 89-1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The defendant was convicted of grand theft in violation of sections 812.014(1), (2)(b),1 Florida Statutes (1987), and of resisting a law enforcement officer without violence pursuant to section 843.02, Florida Statutes (1987).2 The sentence imposed on each count was 3½ years’ incarceration, to be served concurrently.

As to the defendant’s first point on appeal, we note that resisting an officer without violence is a first degree misdemeanor punishable by no more than one year of incarceration. Regarding the defendant’s second point on appeal, we agree that costs were imposed without sufficient notice. See Bull v. State, 548 So.2d 1103 (Fla.1989).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but reverse and remand for resentencing. Costs may be assessed only after notice and a reasonable time to object or request a hearing has been given.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

DANIEL, C.J., and SHARP, W., J., ' concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. State, 552 So. 2d 347, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2711, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6442, 1989 WL 139520 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

552 So. 2d 347 (Reed v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
556 So. 2d 542 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Edwards v. State
554 So. 2d 674 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)