Reed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reed v. State

475 So. 2d 1253, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1919, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15474

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 1985·No. No. 85-1110·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s order which summarily denied his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Upon consideration of his motion, we find that his allegation for relief is facially insufficient to require an evidentiary hearing. • Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order.

OTT, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER LEHAN, JJ., concur. and

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s order which summarily denied his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Upon consideration of his motion, we find that his allegation for relief is facially insufficient to require an evidentiary hearing. • Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order.

OTT, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER LEHAN, JJ., concur. and

Reed v. State, 475 So. 2d 1253, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1919, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15474 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

475 So. 2d 1253 (Reed v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related