Reed v. State ex rel. James

372 So. 2d 4, 1979 Ala. LEXIS 2901
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 25, 1979·No. 78-165·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Thomas Reed from a quo warranto proceeding contesting his right to serve as a legislator. The basis of quo warranto is Reed’s conviction of an attempt to bribe. Because of our holding reversing Reed’s attempt to bribe conviction and rendering the cause (Reed v. State, 372 So.2d 876 (Ala.1979), the judgment below is reversed and this cause is rendered.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ., concur. TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. State ex rel. James, 372 So. 2d 4, 1979 Ala. LEXIS 2901 (Ala. 1979).

372 So. 2d 4 (Reed v. State ex rel. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ABC Bonding Co. v. MONTGOMERY CTY. SUR. COM'N
372 So. 2d 4 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1979)