Reed v. State ex rel. James

Supreme Court of Alabama

Reed v. State ex rel. James

372 So. 2d 4, 1979 Ala. LEXIS 2901

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMay 25, 1979

Docket78-165

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 372 So. 2d 4 (Reed v. State ex rel. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reed v. State ex rel. James, 372 So. 2d 4, 1979 Ala. LEXIS 2901 (Ala. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Thomas Reed from a quo warranto proceeding contesting his right to serve as a legislator. The basis of quo warranto is Reed’s conviction of an attempt to bribe. Because of our holding reversing Reed’s attempt to bribe conviction and rendering the cause (Reed v. State, 372 So.2d 876 (Ala.1979), the judgment below is reversed and this cause is rendered.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ., concur. TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Thomas Reed from a quo warranto proceeding contesting his right to serve as a legislator. The basis of quo warranto is Reed’s conviction of an attempt to bribe. Because of our holding reversing Reed’s attempt to bribe conviction and rendering the cause (Reed v. State, 372 So.2d 876 (Ala.1979), the judgment below is reversed and this cause is rendered.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ., concur. TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

372 So. 2d 4, 1979 Ala. LEXIS 2901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-state-ex-rel-james-ala-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack