Reed v. SITARSKI

Michigan Supreme Court

Reed v. SITARSKI

769 N.W.2d 719

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided August 6, 2009·No. 138767·Published

Opinion

769 N.W.2d 719 (2009)

Tommie Lee REED, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Officer Daniel SITARSKI and Officer Michael Smith, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket Nos. 138767, 138768. COA Nos. 281041, 281403.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

August 6, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 19, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

769 N.W.2d 719 (2009)

Tommie Lee REED, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Officer Daniel SITARSKI and Officer Michael Smith, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket Nos. 138767, 138768. COA Nos. 281041, 281403.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

August 6, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 19, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Reed v. SITARSKI, 769 N.W.2d 719 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

769 N.W.2d 719 (Reed v. SITARSKI) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Tommie Lee REED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer Daniel SITARSKI and Officer Michael Smith, Defendants-Appellees.

Order

Tommie Lee REED, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Officer Daniel SITARSKI and Officer Michael Smith, Defendants-Appellees.