Reed v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided October 6, 2021·No. 19-1319·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Gunited States Court of Federal Claing

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: September 8, 2021

* * * * * * * * * * * * * DANIEL REED, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 19-1319V * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation for Award; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Influenza (“flu”) vaccine; * Transverse myelitis, * Respondent. *

* > * FF * * KF KK HK HK KK HK

Mark T. Sadaka, Law Offices of Sadaka Associates, LLC, for petitioner. Ryan D. Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

DECISION FOR STIPULATION!

On August 29, 2019, Daniel Reed (“petitioner”), filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Program.” Petition at Preamble (ECF No. 1). Petitioner received an influenza vaccine on October 10, 2017. Jd. at Preamble; Stipulation for Award (ECF No. 37). Petitioner alleges that as a result of receiving the flu vaccine, he suffered transverse myelitis and partial Brown-Sequard syndrome. Stipulation at { 4.

On September 7, 2021, respondent filed a stipulation providing that a decision should be entered awarding compensation to petitioner. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine is the cause of petitioner’s alleged injuries, or any other injury or her current condition. /d. at J 6. Nevertheless, maintaining their respective positions, the parties now agree that the issues

1 Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this opinion contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. This means the opinion will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the opinion is posted on the court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the decision.” /d. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will be posted on the court’s website without any changes. /d.

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation to the petitioner according to the terms of the stipulation attached hereto as Appendix A. 7d. at { 7.

The stipulation provides:

1) A lump sum of $200,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the flu vaccine.

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.?

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas L. Gowen

Thomas L. Gowen Special Master

3 Entry of judgment is expedited by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a). THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

DANIEL REED,

Petitioner, V. No. 19-13 19V

Special Master Thoinas L. Gowen

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND BC} HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Daniel Reed (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of an influenza (“flu’”’) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on or about October 10, 2017.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that the flu vaccine caused him to develop “transverse myelitis and partial Brown-Séquard syndrome,” and that he experienced residua! effects of this injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of his condition. 6. Respondent denies that the flu immunization is the cause of petitioner’s alleged transverse myelitis, Brown-Séquard syndrome, and/or any other injury.

7. Maintaining thcir above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, anc after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $290,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount

represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa-15(a) for injurics allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the flu vaccine.

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that they have identified to respondent all known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-!5(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42

U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis. 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 |J.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Reed v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Reed v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a