Reed v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
67 Pa. Super. 110, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 353
Opinion
After careful examination of the record in this case, we conclude that the reasons given by the court below fully justify the conclusion reached, and that from every possible point of view, legal and equitable, the defendant ought to pay the mortgage; and that the rule to show cause why judgment should not be entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense was properly made absolute.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reed v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance, 67 Pa. Super. 110, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 353 (Pa. Ct. App. 1917).
67 Pa. Super. 110 (Reed v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Crutchfield
350 S.W.2d 534 (Texas Supreme Court, 1961)
Miners Savings Bank v. Merchants Fire Insurance
198 A. 495 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Abbottsford Building & Loan Ass'n v. William Penn Fire Ins.
197 A. 504 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Overholt Et Ux. v. Reliance Ins. Co.
179 A. 554 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Behm v. Reliance Insurance
20 Pa. D. & C. 495 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1933)
Clarke & Cohen v. Real Ex Rel. Stroudsburg Nat. Bank
159 A. 454 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Queen Ins. v. People's Union Sav. Bank
50 F.2d 63 (Third Circuit, 1931)
Beaver Falls Building v. Allemania Fire Insurance
101 Pa. Super. 109 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Trustee Building & Loan Ass'n v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance
93 Pa. Super. 242 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Bowers Co. v. London Assurance Corp.
90 Pa. Super. 121 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)