Reed v. Ross
464 U.S. 1036, 104 S. Ct. 694, 79 L. Ed. 2d 161, 52 U.S.L.W. 3509, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 496
This text of 464 U.S. 1036 (Reed v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reed v. Ross, 464 U.S. 1036, 104 S. Ct. 694, 79 L. Ed. 2d 161, 52 U.S.L.W. 3509, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 496 (1984).
Opinion
C. A. 4th Cir. [Certio-rari granted, ante, p. 1007.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Barry Nakell, Esquire, of Boulder, Colo., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
464 U.S. 1036, 104 S. Ct. 694, 79 L. Ed. 2d 161, 52 U.S.L.W. 3509, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-ross-scotus-1984.