Reed v. Reed
This text of 78 S.E. 712 (Reed v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an action for alimony. His Honor, Judge Gage, granted temporary alimony and counsel fees. From this order the defendant appealed. There are two exceptions as follows:
1. “That upon the showing and counter showing made before him on December 11th, 1912, his Honor, Judge Gage, erred in holding that plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for temporary alimony and counsel fees.
2. “It is respectfully submitted that his Honor, Judge Gage, abused the discretion imposed in him in granting said order for temporary alimony and counsel fees.”
These exceptions admit that the matter is in the discretion of the Circuit Judge and no abuse of discretion has been shown. See the recent case of Norman v. Norman, 94 S. C. 204; 77 S. E. Rep. 865, and cases there cited.
It is therefore ordered, that the order appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 S.E. 712, 95 S.C. 130, 1913 S.C. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-reed-sc-1913.