Reed v. Reed

Ohio Court of Appeals

Reed v. Reed

112 N.E.2d 403, 65 Ohio Law. Abs. 135

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 1953·No. No. 499·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT:

We have carefully examined the record in this case together with the briefs of counsel and are of the same opinion as the trial court. Judge Gram, in a lengthy and well considered opinion, properly analyzes the legal questions presented and the laws applicable thereto. It would serve no useful purpose for us to write another opinion; hence we will adopt that of the trial court as our own. The Court of Appeals for Highland County similarly defined “specific legacy” in the case of Hood v. Garrett, 53 Oh Ap 464, at page 468.

Finding no error in the record the judgment will be affirmed.

WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

By THE COURT:

We have carefully examined the record in this case together with the briefs of counsel and are of the same opinion as the trial court. Judge Gram, in a lengthy and well considered opinion, properly analyzes the legal questions presented and the laws applicable thereto. It would serve no useful purpose for us to write another opinion; hence we will adopt that of the trial court as our own. The Court of Appeals for Highland County similarly defined “specific legacy” in the case of Hood v. Garrett, 53 Oh Ap 464, at page 468.

Finding no error in the record the judgment will be affirmed.

WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Reed v. Reed, 112 N.E.2d 403, 65 Ohio Law. Abs. 135 (Ohio Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

112 N.E.2d 403 (Reed v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related