Reed v. Reed

112 N.E.2d 403, 65 Ohio Law. Abs. 135
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 25, 1953
DocketNo. 499
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 N.E.2d 403 (Reed v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed v. Reed, 112 N.E.2d 403, 65 Ohio Law. Abs. 135 (Ohio Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT:

We have carefully examined the record in this case together with the briefs of counsel and are of the same opinion as the trial court. Judge Gram, in a lengthy and well considered opinion, properly analyzes the legal questions presented and the laws applicable thereto. It would serve no useful purpose for us to write another opinion; hence we will adopt that of the trial court as our own. The Court of Appeals for Highland County similarly defined “specific legacy” in the case of Hood v. Garrett, 53 Oh Ap 464, at page 468.

Finding no error in the record the judgment will be affirmed.

WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Witteman
239 N.E.2d 107 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 N.E.2d 403, 65 Ohio Law. Abs. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-reed-ohioctapp-1953.