Reed v. Reed

Nebraska Supreme Court

Reed v. Reed

453 N.W.2d 742, 235 Neb. 96, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 124

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided April 20, 1990·No. No. 88-428·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner-appellant father, William D. Reed, assigns as error the district court’s failure to modify the child support payments previously awarded the respondent-appellee mother, Sharon R. Reed.

We, as required, have reviewed the district court’s action de novo on the record; we determine therefrom that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the father’s application. Accordingly, the action of the district court is affirmed.

The mother is awarded the sum of $500 to apply toward the services of her attorney in this court.

Affirmed.

Fahrnbruch, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petitioner-appellant father, William D. Reed, assigns as error the district court’s failure to modify the child support payments previously awarded the respondent-appellee mother, Sharon R. Reed.

We, as required, have reviewed the district court’s action de novo on the record; we determine therefrom that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the father’s application. Accordingly, the action of the district court is affirmed.

The mother is awarded the sum of $500 to apply toward the services of her attorney in this court.

Affirmed.

Fahrnbruch, J., not participating.

Reed v. Reed, 453 N.W.2d 742, 235 Neb. 96, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 124 (Neb. 1990).

Pincite

453 N.W.2d 742 (Reed v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.