Reed v. Reed

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reed v. Reed

268 So. 3d 206

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 5, 2019

DocketCase No. 5D18-1120

StatusPublished

This text of 268 So. 3d 206 (Reed v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reed v. Reed, 268 So. 3d 206 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that, in appellate proceedings, the trial court's decision carries a presumption of correctness and, thus, the appellant has the burden to bring forth an adequate record to demonstrate error); Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So.2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (treating the challenge to adequate findings as unpreserved error unless previously brought to the trial court's attention in a motion for rehearing).

BERGER, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that, in appellate proceedings, the trial court's decision carries a presumption of correctness and, thus, the appellant has the burden to bring forth an adequate record to demonstrate error); Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So.2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (treating the challenge to adequate findings as unpreserved error unless previously brought to the trial court's attention in a motion for rehearing).

BERGER, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 So. 3d 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-reed-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack