Reed v. Reed

244 So. 2d 449
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 18, 1971
DocketN-118
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 244 So. 2d 449 (Reed v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed v. Reed, 244 So. 2d 449 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

244 So.2d 449 (1971)

Frances G. REED, Appellant,
v.
Ernest L. REED, Jr., Appellee.

No. N-118.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 18, 1971.

*450 John M. Coe, of Coe & Coe, Pensacola, for appellant.

Walter J. Smith, of Smith, Tolton & Wolff, Ft. Walton Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a final judgment in a divorce suit, the issue herein being the failure to award alimony to appellant. This matter has been before the court earlier at which time we entered our decision remanding the case for further action. Said decision is reported at 226 So.2d 114.

Upon consideration of the record on appeal, the briefs and the arguments of counsel, it is our view that there is a sufficient evidentiary showing of a likelihood that appellee's financial circumstances will materially improve hereafter, thus enabling him to make alimony payments to appellant in the future. Alternatively, the circumstances of appellant may be so changed in the future as to justify or require the award of alimony payments in the event of such change. In order to enable the court below to consider an application for alimony by appellant in the event of changing circumstances by either party, the judgment reviewed in this appeal is hereby amended so as to expressly retain jurisdiction of this cause for future award of alimony upon proper showing.

Except as modified by retaining jurisdiction in accordance with the above, the order appealed is

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C.J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shirley A. O'Brien v. Eugene J. O'Brien
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Barko v. Barko
557 So. 2d 932 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Brown v. Brown
440 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Mumm v. Mumm
353 So. 2d 134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Marshall v. Marshall
273 So. 2d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
McRee v. McRee
267 So. 2d 21 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Poe v. Poe
263 So. 2d 644 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Steinhauer v. Steinhauer
252 So. 2d 825 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 So. 2d 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-reed-fladistctapp-1971.