Reed v. Pierson
3 N.J.L. 681
Opinion
— This evidence was inadmissible. It would be dangerous to admit as proof of payment, that the debtor borrowed money for the purpose of payment; he might have applied the money to other purposes.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reed v. Pierson, 3 N.J.L. 681 (N.J. 1810).
3 N.J.L. 681 (Reed v. Pierson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.