Reed v. Peterson
716 P.2d 778, 78 Or. App. 656, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2660
This text of 716 P.2d 778 (Reed v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reed v. Peterson, 716 P.2d 778, 78 Or. App. 656, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2660 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).
Opinion
At oral argument it was pointed out that the confinement sought to be tested by the writ of habeas corpus may have ended. It had. The state moves to dismiss the appeal as moot. The motion is allowed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
716 P.2d 778, 78 Or. App. 656, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-peterson-orctapp-1986.