Reed v. Peguese

Fourth Circuit

Reed v. Peguese

86 F. App'x 644

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 9, 2004·No. No. 03-7634·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert A. Reed appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Reed v. Peguese, No. CA-03-726-PJM (D.Md. filed Sept. 26, 2003 & entered Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[645] fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert A. Reed appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Reed v. Peguese, No. CA-03-726-PJM (D.Md. filed Sept. 26, 2003 & entered Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[645] fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reed v. Peguese, 86 F. App'x 644 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

86 F. App'x 644 (Reed v. Peguese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related