Reed v. Peguese

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 9, 2004
• Docket: 03-7634
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7634

ROBERT A. REED,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES V. PEGUESE, Warden of MCH-X Prison; SHARALE ADAMS, Correctional Officer II; TRENT MILES, Sergeant; ANNA MADDOX,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 03-726-PJM)

Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 9, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert A. Reed, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Robert A. Reed appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Reed v. Peguese, No. CA-

03-726-PJM (D. Md. filed Sept. 26, 2003 & entered Sept. 30, 2003).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -