Reed v. Oakley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reed v. Oakley

240 A.D.2d 991, 659 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6983

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 26, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—(1) Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ferradino, J.), entered February 7, 1996 in Saratoga County, which denied defendant Gary W. Oakley’s motion to dismiss the complaint for, inter alia, failure to state a cause of action, and (2) cross appeals from an order of said court, entered December 4, 1996 in Saratoga County, which, inter alia, partially granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against said defendant on the issue of liability.

[992]*992Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—(1) Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ferradino, J.), entered February 7, 1996 in Saratoga County, which denied defendant Gary W. Oakley’s motion to dismiss the complaint for, inter alia, failure to state a cause of action, and (2) cross appeals from an order of said court, entered December 4, 1996 in Saratoga County, which, inter alia, partially granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against said defendant on the issue of liability.

[992]*992Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with costs.

Reed v. Oakley, 240 A.D.2d 991, 659 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

240 A.D.2d 991 (Reed v. Oakley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related